02-07-2013, 12:31 PM
|
|
WSI Personality
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 527
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComiskeyBrewer
Probably didn't, and should be in the hall of fame i agree. But i honestly can't say one way or the other with 100% certainty. I wasn't in that locker room with him.
Never said there wasn't, but i think drugs in the 60s and 70s played a much larger role than some. People poo-poo amphetamines like they weren't a factor, but decry HGH, when the roles they play are not that different.
I'm not trying to compare, saying both are equally bad(they aren't even close, IMO), but i think drugs in the past played a bigger role than many want to admit.
|
Yes, yes, and yes.
|