Originally Posted by Nellie_Fox
You will not acknowledge that you are off base by taking "could be" and changing it to "probably," not break camp with the team, and then extending that "probably" to missing the first month, and then defending your double construction by claiming that is what they originally said.
Stop digging a hole and then crying "personal attacks" when people point to the hole you're in.
"COULD BE" isn't a reference in that piece to injury. It's a reference to 100% healthy. In the situation where Danks is 100% healthy, he still may not break camp. That doesn't even account for the chances of him not being 100%. So how likely now?
I swear, it's like people don't know how to read.