Originally Posted by blandman
I don't distinguish between the two. You're arguing with me for no reason. There's a really good chance I'm right, and it's based on things published in legitimate media outlets.
He's arguing with you based on you making statements that are NOT supported by things published in media outlets, and then moving your statements around on every post. Instead of addressing where your statements have been refuted, you bring up a different argument.
Here's a suggestion: just stop trying to defend it. But if you do, unless someone starts calling you names, don't cry about the opposition you're getting.