Originally Posted by kittle42
It seems to me they have every right to block their view, at least after the deal ends. Haven't looked enough to see if they have grounds for doing it now.
I'm still curious why MLB hasn't stepped in at any point. Did the Cubs get MLB's approval when they signed the original deal with the rooftop owners, because it sure seems like the rooftops are stealing MLB's product, not the Cubs? If the Cubs didn't, that would seem like a major trump card that the Cubs could try to play - or have MLB play - IMO. Granted, I know nothing of the laws regarding this, contracts, etc., I just thought it was always funny that the deal was with the Cubs, not MLB.