White Sox Interactive Forums
What's The Score?

Welcome
Go Back   White Sox Interactive Forums > Baseball Discussions > What's The Score?
Home Chat Stats Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #196  
Old 06-12-2012, 06:27 PM
russ99 russ99 is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,671
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lip Man 1
Fielder:

Assuming you had a newer TV in the first place. It was mandatory by the FCC but if you didn't have a set with a dial that actually got UHF channels you were screwed.

In my neighborhood (Back of the Yards) there were Sox fans everywhere but very few of them were going to spring for a new TV.

Reception was awful when the Sox first went over and it didn't get better until the early 70's.

Lip
Wasn't there a broadcast range issue with UHF then too?

By the time I was watching games with regularity, the Sox and Harry were on Ch.44 and the UHF reception issues were lessened. But there were times I had to wiggle the dial.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 06-12-2012, 08:20 PM
DumpJerry's Avatar
DumpJerry DumpJerry is offline
Tom Feargal Hagen
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The hearts and minds of Sox fans on 10-26-05
Posts: 25,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kittle42 View Post
For three days, it's sadly Go, Cubs, Go.
I would post they will do the same for us over the next three days, but that won't change the big picture for them.
__________________

‎Fire Adam Dunn.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 06-12-2012, 09:29 PM
kba kba is offline
WSI Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lip Man 1 View Post
This and that:
Also in fact, leaving WGN was a unmitigated disaster because YOU COULDN'T GET WFLD-TV in the Chicago area. The technology was new and untested. Richard Roeper wrote about those issues in his book "Sox and the City..." At best, the picture you got was snowy and blurry.
The WFLD move was a disaster in a lot of ways, but the Sox did it because the station paid the then-unheard-of amount of million dollars a year for the rights to the telecasts. In a 1971 Tribune article, Sox GM Stu Holcomb said the WFLD money was the only thing keeping the Sox franchise afloat and keeping John Allyn from moving the team.

The same article quoted announcer Jack Drees saying that even if WFLD sold out all the advertising time on the telecasts, the station would still lose $600,000 to $700,000 a year. While the Cubs ratings on WGN were in the mid-teens, the Sox were getting 2's and 3's on WFLD.
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 06-12-2012, 10:41 PM
FielderJones's Avatar
FielderJones FielderJones is offline
WSI Village Atheist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Clarendon Hills
Posts: 4,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lip Man 1 View Post
In my neighborhood (Back of the Yards) there were Sox fans everywhere but very few of them were going to spring for a new TV.
My gramps was Back of the Yards too, not exactly rolling in dough as he had been a laborer in the Stockyards. Some of my single uncles who still lived at home popped for the TV.

Were there really that many B&W Philcos with only VHF still left by 1968?
__________________
2013 Attendance Record: 1 - 1

April 27 L
May 12 W

Next Game: May 25
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 06-12-2012, 10:56 PM
Lip Man 1 Lip Man 1 is offline
WSI Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chubbuck, Idaho
Posts: 26,016
Default

Fielder:

Yes there was. Folks who bought sets in 64-65 weren't going to suddenly dump them just to see the Sox.

Seriously I don't think I'm exaggerating the issue, although granted 45 years ago is a long time. But Rich Lindberg the Sox historian has written the same thing in his books and as I said, Richard Roeper devoted a chapter to it in his book.

KBA:

Valid point. Although I'd say Art Allyn (who owner the team then, not John) was still being shortsighted. He had to know (unless someone sold him a bill of goods, which is possible) that reception was going to be poor and you didn't have the same number of sets that could even get the channel. I can't fault him heavily for taking the money (although the Sox weren't losing money through 68) but in retrospect it was a disasterous decision.

I'd argue (and its going to be a part of my speech in a few weeks at the Allen celebration), that it was the money the Sox made because of the 72 season AND the resulting new AM radio contract with WMAQ for 1973 that kept them from moving. John Allyn had just enough money to survive when his other business interests went belly-up and he nearly went bankrupt. He hung on long enough to sell to Veeck instead of doing what the league wanted and move the Sox to Seattle.

By the way you wouldn't happen to have a link to the story with Jack Drees would you?

Lip
Reply With Quote
  #201  
Old 06-12-2012, 11:31 PM
Noneck Noneck is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nw Side
Posts: 5,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FielderJones View Post
Were there really that many B&W Philcos with only VHF still left by 1968?

Yes there were, just about everyone in my family didnt have uhf TV's. Also the outside antennas had to be changed because a different type of antenna was needed to to get uhf.
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 06-13-2012, 07:46 AM
LITTLE NELL's Avatar
LITTLE NELL LITTLE NELL is online now
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sebring Florida
Posts: 6,841
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noneck View Post
Yes there were, just about everyone in my family didnt have uhf TV's. Also the outside antennas had to be changed because a different type of antenna was needed to to get uhf.
We had to be one of the first families in our neighborhood to have UHF, my Dad was a electronics nut and always was up on the latest technology, IIRC it was summer of 64 or 65 when we got the UHF. I can't remember what shows were on but when I was discharged from the USAF in 1969 all the Sox games came in very clear and there were never any ghosts like you would get on VHF.
__________________
Coming up to bat for our White Sox is the Mighty Mite, Nelson Fox.
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 06-13-2012, 08:40 AM
kba kba is offline
WSI Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lip Man 1 View Post
Fielder:

By the way you wouldn't happen to have a link to the story with Jack Drees would you?

Lip
Behind a paywall here. If you have access to ProQuest, you can search the Tribune archives free.
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 06-13-2012, 10:03 AM
FielderJones's Avatar
FielderJones FielderJones is offline
WSI Village Atheist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Clarendon Hills
Posts: 4,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by LITTLE NELL View Post
We had to be one of the first families in our neighborhood to have UHF, my Dad was a electronics nut and always was up on the latest technology, IIRC it was summer of 64 or 65 when we got the UHF.
Same here. My Dad had an amateur radio license as a kid, was a radio tech in the Navy and for UAL at Midway, so we had UHF in 1964. I remember him watching the stock ticker on Channel 26. There was never a time when I couldn't watch the Sox.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.




Design by: Michelle

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site-specific editorial/photos Copyright ©2001 - 2008 White Sox Interactive. All rights reserved. Message Board Statistics