White Sox Interactive Forums
What's The Score?

Welcome
Go Back   White Sox Interactive Forums > Baseball Discussions > What's The Score?
Home Chat Stats Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-12-2013, 08:08 AM
Fastball23 Fastball23 is offline
WSI Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 259
Default Peavy to AZ?

Buster Olney@Buster_ESPN2h
Diamondbacks are among the teams talking about Jake Peavy, and CWS have had scouts on hand at Arizona games; they've seen Randall Delgado.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2013, 08:15 AM
pythons007 pythons007 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cedar Lake IN
Posts: 2,372
Default

Look into some position players!!!!
__________________


YOUR 2005 WORLD CHAMPION CHICAGO WHITE SOX
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2013, 08:35 AM
Fastball23 Fastball23 is offline
WSI Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pythons007 View Post
Look into some position players!!!!
If Peavy goes to AZ, I'd like to see the Sox get Owings and Stryker Trahan
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-12-2013, 09:39 AM
kittle42 kittle42 is offline
WSI Prelate
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lakeview
Posts: 18,211
Default

Randall Delgado isn't even a prized prospect anymore.
__________________
Ridiculousness across all sports:

(1) "You have no valid opinion because you never played the game."
(2) "Stats are irrelevant. This guy just doesn't know how to win."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2013, 10:17 AM
Tragg Tragg is offline
WSI Prelate
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gonzales LA
Posts: 12,911
Blog Entries: 2
Default

If they trade him for Delgado, that would suggest the Williams giveaway program is still up and running. That won't happen.
Heck, we'd be better off getting the 2nd pitcher that we traded/gave for Edwin Jackson back.
I do wonder about Hahn's comments, as reported in the media, that he's looking for "major league ready" players. That doesn't necessarily mean high ceiling - it could mean Gillespie types and middle relievers, and guys eligible for Rule 5. I'd rather go after high ceiling players, even if they a couple of years away.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2013, 10:19 AM
Fastball23 Fastball23 is offline
WSI Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 259
Default

How about Peavy & Crain to AZ for Owings, Trahan, Davidson and Barret?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-12-2013, 10:35 AM
blandman blandman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tragg View Post
If they trade him for Delgado, that would suggest the Williams giveaway program is still up and running. That won't happen.
Heck, we'd be better off getting the 2nd pitcher that we traded/gave for Edwin Jackson back.
I do wonder about Hahn's comments, as reported in the media, that he's looking for "major league ready" players. That doesn't necessarily mean high ceiling - it could mean Gillespie types and middle relievers, and guys eligible for Rule 5. I'd rather go after high ceiling players, even if they a couple of years away.
This is, indeed, a dark time to be a White Sox fan. Miserable team and system, and a front office in denial. We're officially what the Cubs were the last 30 years. Reinsdorf needs to go.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-12-2013, 10:51 AM
doublem23's Avatar
doublem23 doublem23 is offline
MMXXIII
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Roscoe Village
Posts: 53,998
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blandman View Post
This is, indeed, a dark time to be a White Sox fan. Miserable team and system, and a front office in denial. We're officially what the Cubs were the last 30 years. Reinsdorf needs to go.
One sort of big difference
__________________
2014 Obligatory Attendance & Record Tracker

0-5

LAST GAME: August 4 - Twins 16, Sox 3
NEXT GAME: I don't know, but I'll be sure to warn you when I know
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-12-2013, 11:02 AM
blandman blandman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doublem23 View Post
One sort of big difference
I mean starting this year. If the plan is really to take a 100 loss roster and add a few pieces for the illusion of competition, lucking in to a division with a no chance team every five year or so...then yeah, we're on that model. It sounds like they're looking around for now players instead of future core players. Which is not only a really bad idea, but it makes them look like complete morons.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-12-2013, 11:14 AM
Tragg Tragg is offline
WSI Prelate
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gonzales LA
Posts: 12,911
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blandman View Post
I mean starting this year. If the plan is really to take a 100 loss roster and add a few pieces for the illusion of competition, lucking in to a division with a no chance team every five year or so...then yeah, we're on that model. It sounds like they're looking around for now players instead of future core players. Which is not only a really bad idea, but it makes them look like complete morons.
Hopefully he's talking about ready now, impact guys. And when he can't get those guys, he lowers his price to impact guys, ready later. We don't need any more Dannny Richars or Zack Stewarts on this squad.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-12-2013, 11:14 AM
Irishsox1 Irishsox1 is offline
WSI Church Elder
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,053
Default

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-12-2013, 11:22 AM
SCCWS SCCWS is offline
WSI Personality
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blandman View Post
I mean starting this year. If the plan is really to take a 100 loss roster and add a few pieces for the illusion of competition, lucking in to a division with a no chance team every five year or so...then yeah, we're on that model. It sounds like they're looking around for now players instead of future core players. Which is not only a really bad idea, but it makes them look like complete morons.
Why not wait and see the first part of the plan take effect before jumping. What "sounds to you" may not be what is really happening.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-12-2013, 11:47 AM
blandman blandman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCCWS View Post
Why not wait and see the first part of the plan take effect before jumping. What "sounds to you" may not be what is really happening.
This attitude is exactly why we've got a 100 loss team. Bad moves abound and no one wants to rock the boat. "No, keep trying, we can't take the rebuild". But you can take another 90 year championship drought? Jesus.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-12-2013, 11:49 AM
blandman blandman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tragg View Post
Hopefully he's talking about ready now, impact guys. And when he can't get those guys, he lowers his price to impact guys, ready later. We don't need any more Dannny Richars or Zack Stewarts on this squad.
Randall Delgado would fit that last mold.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-12-2013, 11:57 AM
dickallen15 dickallen15 is offline
WSI High Priest
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blandman View Post
This attitude is exactly why we've got a 100 loss team. Bad moves abound and no one wants to rock the boat. "No, keep trying, we can't take the rebuild". But you can take another 90 year championship drought? Jesus.
You have mentioned 100 losses quite often. How about a wager?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.




Design by: Michelle

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site-specific editorial/photos Copyright ©2001 - 2008 White Sox Interactive. All rights reserved.