#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Watching the Cleveland feed tonight and they're talking about a call that went against them yesterday.
http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/6381756...?query=indians Reminds me a lot of what happened to Eaton last week: http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/6381756...h/?query=white This time, however, the umpires called it "no catch" on the field and it was upheld after Cleveland challenged. And this looked a lot more like a definite catch than Eaton's. Apparently it's an area that is being watched more closely this season - the transfer from glove to hand must be clean or else no catch. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-...JmMQR2dGlkAw-- I think it's silly. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
![]() 2020....2020.....2020....2020....2020..... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Teevan @MRTeevs
On 102 #MLB replays through yesterday: 35 'confirmed'; 30 'stood'; 36 'overturned'; and 1 for record-keeping. Average length: 2:03. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 24m
BREAKING: A catch is a catch again. Interpretation of transfer rule will be adjusted, starting tonight. Story: http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/mlb-makes-1st-major-adjustment-of-replay-era-tweaks-transfer-rule-042514 … |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
#9 2015 Obligatory Attendance/Record Tracker 1-2 LAST GAME: May 22 - Sox 3, Twins 2 NEXT GAME: June 8 - Sox vs. Astros |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Can you retroactively play a game under protest? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Glad the rule has changed.
__________________
ILLINI FOR LIFE |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|